Anna Wintour

Drama is dangerous

Heroines are carnivores,

And talent demands

Burnt sacrifice.

Vogue

Yon Cassius hath a lean and hungry look. Would he were fatter.

Julius Caesar

4. Anna Wintour

Anna Wintour, cold and set

Vintage lace and cigarettes

Faded nails filed red

Darted bobs and brown barrettes

Count their bouncing, bobbing heads

Take their cake and give them bread

Spin the dials on their phones

Lids of grey and lips of lead

Sallow skin and jutting bones

Sell the branded silver stones

Picking pockets, posit pay

As you sit inside our homes

Pretty kitten! Marmalade!

Melt and molten masquerade

Rip the fabric, never rush

Prim and prickly doll parade.

Crucifixes, watch and fast,

Go and kill the fatted calf.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Pocahontas

Et lui dit: je te donnerair toutes ces choses, si tute prosternes, et m’adores. de Matthiew 4:9

3. Pocahontas

Pocahontas, shiftless, lean

Growing in the grades of green

Blending bare with bark of brown

Swift and sudden, seldom seen

Pocathontas in the dew

Couter chere et couter peau 

Less than brazen, more than brass

House of chamomile hue.

Pocahontas, traitor-trashed

Wash your feet and take the mass

Pocahontas dreams in white

Beating on the broken glass.

Lying lying with the logs

Hidden from the gaze of gods

Blowing soft albino clouds

Giving narcissistic nods.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Cleopatra

By the twitching of my thumbs,

Something wicked this way comes.

Macbeth.

2. Cleopatra

Cleopatra, shining bright

Shiver, shiver in the light

Babalonic, touch your hair

Subtle goddess, supple sight.

Cleopatra, do they stare?

Crystal ball, dynamic pair.

Quelle a flickered in your eyes?

Dripping, drinking, drunk despair.

Cleopatra, do they sigh?

Moan and murmur, cut and cry?

Liver, lover, lashes cold

Twitching touches, lowered eyes.

Cleopatra, worship gold

Egypt’s blanket, baked and sold

Slipping silver, sell your soul

Faustus whispers, “never old.”

Cleopatra has the hole

Black and burning, dismal, dole

Ankles locking, fingers fold

Hollow love, complete and cold.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Me Dice, Musa

If thou dost seek to have what thou dost hide, by self-example thou mayst be denied. – 142

1. Me Dice, Musa
  
Listen, listen to the voice
Presto, largo, and rejoice
Slip and simmer, simply slide
Vici, vidi is our choice.
 
Murmur, murmur, turn the tide
Grip and glimmer, open wide
Idzie, idzie, idziemy
Blessed Venus, sooth my pride.
 
Faster, faster flies the day
Seratonin, shift and sway
Turning, burning, learning fast
How to shiver; how to pray.
 
Wander, wander, ponder past
Find veritas (farther cast)
Fonder feelings fleeing fast
Me Dice, Musa, make it last.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Ode to my Grandfather

He drank his coffee

With no cream

And drove his tractor like

Alive.

His wife planted flowers

For she was an environmentalist,

Before it was popular.

He’d wanted a good wife

In a little house

With two little girls (or boys)

For he was a progressive

(Before he knew what that was)

And didn’t much care about passing down

His name.

Why do you go

Why do you go

Why do you plant flowers upon

Your mother’s grave?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Subliminal Domination and Why Feminists Are Right (!)

“As a result of the feminist revolution, ‘feminine’ becomes an abusive epithet.”
 Wyndham Lewis

Before I went to college, I never realized that I was subliminally dominated by men, betrayed by the very words I uttered every day. Nobody taught me Latin, the gender of the origin of my English nouns;  no teacher suggested I could use pronouns referring to generalizations in the neuter, or (goodness gracious!) in the feminine case.

Yet Benjamin Franklin said that “admiration is the daughter of ignorance,” and maybe those who left me in ignorance were gracious.

As a girl I was flattered when, after wearing red white and blue, I was called patriotic. But I never questioned why I couldn’t be matriotic; why patria/patriae (fatherland) instead of matia/matria should form the Latin base-especially when countries are generally formally and informally referred to with feminine pronouns? (Of course, no such Latin noun as matria/matriae exists-subliminal male domination apparently has been an issue for thousands of unhappy years).

Never did I wonder why (in virtually every Latin-based language) unknown or generalized pronouns automatically took masculine form.

“To use his/her as a pronoun simply isn’t technically acceptable.” My mother explained to me after dinner one night, as I stirred my coffee and rebelliously banged my spoon against the rim of my mug.

“It’s awkward.”

I told my mother that it was not acceptable for women to vote a hundred years ago, to go to college two hundred years ago, and to sit and eat dinner at the same time as men two thousand years ago.

We both turned and looked at my father and brother.

My roommate at college claimed that she didn’t feel subliminally dominated at all.

“I was like you once.” I assured her patronizingly. (Or matronizingly?) “However, your denial of your subliminal domination is actually confirming evidence of its effect on you. Subliminal domination has been so successfully applied to you that you don’t even realize its affect.”

I’ve found few people who could argue with this logic.

So I go on, grateful to have my eyes open to the tragic utilization of language as a tool to suppress my sisters, happy to have the opportunity to open my sisters’ eyes to their domination, and pleased to insert feminine generic pronouns whenever I have the opportunity.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Salandar Lisbeth: The Hacking Heroine

Image

Les hommes ont prefere les tenebres a la lumiere, par ce que leurs oeuvres etaient mauvaises.

Men love darkness rather than light, because their deeds are evil. Jean 3:19

I first read of Salandar Lisbeth on a quiet flight home from Florida the fall of my senior year. Sandy beaches in Pensacola shrank behind me as I moved toward what I hoped was a cacophony of color and the sharp coolness of August Michigan.

As I slid away from the bright cheeriness of Florida toward the shaded mellowness of Michigan, the troublesome shadows surrounding Salandar Lisbeth’s description seemed strangely appropriate.

The issue of Vogue I held on my lap informed me that the actress who landed the role of Salandar Lisbeth in the new film The Girl With the Dragon Tatoo consequently sold her soul to box-office immortality. I was intrigued by the odd, troublingly slender woman who captured my attention with a passive, emotionless stare.

The face of Salandar Lisbeth remained with meA month later  (after I’d returned to the sunshine of Florida),  I curled in the darkened bedroom of my dormitory, reading the novel Salandar inspired. Stieg Larsson’s words transcended his translator to entrance me in his story of a quiet, strange, anti-social girl with underestimated intellect. I was awed by and jealous of Salandar (my dark, cunning, brilliant, understated, absolute antithesis).

In the past decade two Byronic characters captured the attention of America and the world: Edward Cullen and Salandar Lisbeth. Edward was idol-worshipped by millions of women of every age; Salandar provided the most coveted role for the female actresses of this century.

Both personify inherent Byronic characteristics (darkness and brooding remorse without repentance). They live by their own moral code; they are separate from but attractive to those around them.

The Byronic hero as a woman was a novel idea.

I was awed by Salandar Lisbeth. If only I could so brilliantly use technology as a medium to hack into the personal financial records and private social information of the people I knew.

I paused.

While Salandar is masterly crafted, one must remember her profession (and hobbies) are illegal. (Just as Edward Cullen’s watching Bella as she slept suggests unhealthy stalking tendencies.) Byronic characters are generally allowed some “wiggle room” in matters of morality.

But why does modern culture choose to idolize such behaviors as ingenious hacking and habitual stalking?

Do we find comfort in comparing ourselves to the dark knight, to Delilah, or to Brutus? Do squeaky-clean heroes irritate our consciences?

Would we rather compare ourselves with Judas or Jesus?

Do we subconsciously need our heroes to contain substantial flaws to save us from guilt through comparison? Or does genius attract us-shady,  immeasurable genius that requires on some level a substantial separation from middle-class morality?

Les homes ont prefere les tenebres a la lumiere, par ce que leurs oeuvres etaient mauvaises.

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized